Resurrection Deniers
In my experience, it is the doctrine of the Resurrection on which orthodoxy stands or falls.
Whenever we allow ourselves or others to believe that the Resurrection MAY be only allegory, myth, or symbolic rather than actual…
…Certainly when we begin to deny that the Resurrection of Jesus Christ is central to the Christian faith
Essential
…that one can be a Christian and deny the Resurrection…
We are negating the core doctrine of the Christian faith.
Now, certainly, we can see many layers of meaning in The Resurrection
But our faith rests not in its meaning, but in its having actually happened
This is where otherwise orthodox, traditionalist Christians slip over the edge and then rather quickly abandon many other essential Christian doctrines
Either in response to pressure from popular cultural beliefs
Or just because they lose the focus on what is really important
Substituting some area of theology, such as compassion or social justice…
Their first step is to allow the unbiblical notion that the Resurrection is a symbol or a myth
That it didn’t actually happen in history
And that believing that it DID actually happen in history is not essential to being a Christian
Once you go there, it is a short journey to the heretical belief that Jesus didn’t rise from the dead
Except symbolically
That’s when fanciful notions that Jesus didn’t really die on the cross, that He only “swooned”, passed out, because of the pain and loss of fluids!
And then He married Mary Magdalen and they had several kids… and so on and so on…!
But then, of course, like all other mere human beings, He would have died later on
Which gives rise to “finding the tomb of Jesus” and so on and so on…
And these people have the audacity to continue to claim the name “Christian”!
The Church through the ages has said: “Heresy!”
False teaching, false doctrine
Today we just shrug our shoulders and pass it off as “diversity”!
There is absolutely no biblical foundation to believe that the Resurrection of Jesus Christ did not actually happen!
The Bible is crystal clear on this
The Church has affirmed it from the very beginning
And the Church has labeled as “heresy” any attempt to deny it and remain “Christian”
At least, until today!
Many mainline clergy, bishops, seminaries and laity do not believe that the Resurrection of Christ actually happened in history.
They believe that it is symbol, myth
That it speaks of “higher” values and truth
They deny the “faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints” (Jude 3)
And then are aghast whenever anyone tries to hold them accountable to their vows of membership or ordination, which affirms the orthodox faith!
Instead, they seem content to try and change the Church’s teachings based on their vain imaginings (Acts 4:25), insisting that the Church allow their heresy to co-exist along side of the orthodox faith
In the name of “pluralism” or “diversity”
My contention is that any preacher who denies the Resurrection should not be in a Christian pulpit or otherwise speak for the Christian faith!
If by that I am “intolerant”, so be it!
But I think there are some things that one needs to believe in order to be a Christian.
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the first and foremost of those things.
John Wesley would have certainly numbered the Resurrection among the “essentials” around which there must be unity.